This one is in 2 parts. Not the book, but the review :-)
One thing I learned by tapping into audio books, is The Narrator makes the book. You can have a great story, but if the narrator doesn't do it for you, you're wasting your time trying to "sit thru" to the end of the book, so.... IF I have an audio book to review, I will also mention the narrator, and if it's really bad and I can't sit thru the rest of the book, I will try and read the actual book, and do the review on it... (It will happen, trust me) I think, the narrator doesn't make a book better, maybe more enjoyable, but they can definitely ruin it. Charles did not ruin the book!
Now on to the reason you're reading this: The Review!
I can't say enough times how much I love this book! Now, I could leave it at that, but we all know I have more to say than that :-) The book tells the story of the investigation AND the "here and now" of the Boat Man in a way, you would see in a movie, were the culprit is watching the police do their thing, with a little of his mindset and thoughts dispensed with it. And it's told in a way that feels natural. You get a glimps of A, the result becomes part of B's day, he deals with it to solve it, and so on. The way the author weaves the story around and around, the details given, the thoughts and processes of the investigator and the whole vibe....... It's awesome and a little scary when he does it with the boat man, it's still a bit disconcerting to know the author had to come up with it :-) It's a thriller, but it's not. I know, it's weird. There is so much tension written into the story, but it has nothing of the "leading up to" stress and racing heart you would have with a thriller except for maybe turning an extra light on in the hallway.... but there is no way you're putting the book down before you finish, because you won't be able to stop wondering. LOL! Definitely looking this author up for the rest of the series!
Now to the narrator. NO ONE BETTER to tell this story than Charles Constant. His voice is steady throughout the whole thing. His inflections are not acted out, but normal speech patterns you would hear if somebody is telling the story in person, not reading to you. He seems to be genuinely enjoying the telling of the story, he's engaged without going over the top. The couple of times he changed to give a person a voice, he did it subtle. He didn't go into some falsetto when speaking for a female, or changed his accent or tone of voice when speaking like a male. It was more of a "someone else is talking now" thing. Not sure how to explain, but it was a good thing! :-)
Can't wait to read the rest of them, maybe indulge in another audio verson, as long as Charles is the narrator....